Energy equity child at table doing homework by light of a desk lamp

New energy technologies, such as rooftop solar panels, are typically first adopted by the affluent. Yet those with the least income could benefit most from lower electricity bills associated with energy efficiency retrofits, demand response information, and rooftop solar. Well-crafted policy can help bring the benefits of energy equity to those most in need.

Low-income households often face the highest energy burdens — that is, they spend higher shares of their income on their energy bills and sometimes have to face difficult decisions about expenditures on other needs in order to keep their utilities on. The Luskin Center for Innovation (LCI) is expanding research in energy affordability to ensure that the most vulnerable households are able to keep their lights on.

Through research and collaborations with stakeholders, LCI seeks to advance energy equity by informing policies and programs that empower communities, particularly those that are low-income, to benefit from energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other clean energy strategies. Examples follow.

LA100 Equity Strategies, Chapter 13: Energy Affordability and Policy Solutions Analysis

(2023 report)
LCI researchers: Gregory Pierce, Kelly Trumbull, and Dan Coffee

To support Los Angeles’s transition to 100% renewable electricity by 2035, this chapter provides specific recommendations for robust, long-term, structural solutions to LADWP’s customers’ ability to pay their bills. The complete LA 100 Equity Strategies Study includes chapters written by other UCLA researchers, including those with expertise in engineering, environmental science, law, labor studies, public health, and public policy.

Supporting Household Access to Complex Low-Income Energy Assistance programs (2022 report)

Researchers: Gregory Pierce, Rachel Connolly, and Kelly Trumbull

This report analyzes an adaptation of the original emPOWER approach to provide more targeted support to Southern California Edison-served households in Kings and Tulare counties. The most novel distributive impact of the pilot was connecting households to Arrearage Management Plan, a debt forgiveness program.

The Energy Implications of Greater Reliance on Direct Potable Reuse Water Recycling in Import-Reliant Regions: Evidence from Los Angeles County (2023 report)

Researchers: Nicholas Chow, JR DeShazo, Omar Moghaddam

This research explores the energy intensities to implement an advanced water treatment process, specifically for direct potable reuse, and seeks to inform decision makers on important considerations facing water managers, energy managers, and environmental actors. This study uses the County of Los Angeles as a case study to quantitatively examine the water, energy, and greenhouse gas tradeoffs of utilizing different water supply sources.

COVID-19 and Utility Debt (2021 briefing paper series: Brief 1  |  Brief 2  |  Brief 3)

Authors: Silvia R. González, Paul M. Ong, Gregory Pierce, Ariana Hernandez, and Kelly Trumbull

In this project, researchers examined the extent of water, gas, and electric bill debt in California and found that, across the board, utility debt burdens fell disproportionately on Black, Latinx, and low-income households. While for over a year, a utility shutoff ban protected residents who were behind on utility bills from having their gas, water, or electricity shut off, the ban ended September 30, 2021. The study outlines several policy implications of the inequitable debt burden; for example, the authors suggest the use of debt-forgiveness programs to reduce debt burden. They also note that efforts to mitigate climate change, including residential building electrification, must take on an equity lens to avoid intensifying energy burdens for disadvantaged communities.

Southern California Regional Energy Needs Assessment (2021 report)

Authors: Kelly Trumbull and J.R. DeShazo

This report, supported by the Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator and the California Energy Commission, examines disparities in energy consumption and clean energy access across Southern California. The study highlights the importance of targeting investments in lower-income, disadvantaged, and heat-burdened communities, both to advance equity and to encourage emissions reductions. While overall clean energy access is unevenly spread among residents, the researchers find that electric vehicle charging stations are more equitably distributed — an outcome policymakers can learn from when ramping up rooftop solar and energy storage programs.

The Role of Community Choice Aggregators in Advancing Clean Energy Transitions (2020 report)

Authors: Kelly Trumbull, Julien Gattaciecca, and J.R. DeShazo

Despite a lack of action at the federal level, the transition to carbon-free energy is becoming a reality across the United States. At the local level, community choice aggregators (CCAs) — which offer communities public control over their electricity purchasing decisions — are accelerating this transition. Through these electricity providers, member communities can choose how much renewable energy is offered to their residents and businesses. In California, CCAs have become an effective tool at enabling local climate action. This report, supported by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, explores why and how CCAs are effectively advancing goals for carbon-free energy. The study found that CCAs serve a variety of communities with a range of median incomes, political affiliations, and sizes. It also found that CCAs typically offered their communities competitive rates and higher shares of renewable energy.

See other LCI reports on community choice energy here.

Evaluation of emPOWER: Grassroots Outreach to Connect Low-Income Households with Clean Energy Programs (2020 report)

Researchers: Gregory Pierce, Colleen Callahan, and Rachel Connolly

The Liberty Hill Foundation commissioned LCI to evaluate emPOWER, a coordinated outreach project connecting low-income households with energy efficiency, solar energy, low-carbon transportation, and financial assistance programs. The pilot activated community-based organizations to conduct outreach, information sharing, and technical assistance to help eligible residents sign up for free programs that can help them save money and conserve energy. LCI’s evaluation found that the campaign has been successful in reaching areas of L.A. County impacted by poverty and pollution, and offers potential as a replicable model for the state.

Golden Opportunity: Affordable Housing in the Solar Metropolis (2017 report)

Authors: J.R. DeShazo, Michael Kadish, and Alex Turek

Los Angeles County is a national leader in the adoption of residential solar. But not everyone is directly benefiting yet. Most early adopters are affluent households who can afford the up-front investment cost, a common technology adoption trend that has resulted in an inequitable distribution of solar and its benefits. Yet low-income households typically spend a higher percentage of their income on energy costs and thus stand to benefit most from utility bill savings associated with solar systems. A report by LCI and GRID Alternatives assesses the barriers to solar adoption for low-income residents and provides a roadmap for how they could be overcome by unlocking millions of dollars in state incentives for residential solar on affordable housing.

Guide to Design Decisions for Utility-Sponsored Community Solar (2015 report)

Authors: J.R. DeShazo, Alex Turek, and Michael Samulon

The number of community solar programs is increasing throughout the U.S. A goal is to bring energy and environmental equity to renters and others who face barriers to owning solar panels on their own home. This LCI report identifies and clarifies important junctures in decision-making when utilities design a community solar program. This includes the importance of garnering support from potential participants, non-participating ratepayers, and the community at large.

Sharing Solar’s Promise to Create Jobs and Build Social Equity (2014 report)

Authors from UCLA’s LCI: J.R. DeShazo and Alex Turek

Los Angeles launched the nation’s largest Feed-in Tariff (FiT) In Basin Solar program in 2013, helping to catalyze an emerging market for multifamily housing, commercial, warehouse, and industrial rooftop solar. Part of the promise of a properly designed and well-implemented FiT is that it will drive economic growth, enhance environmental sustainability, and create social equity in the workforce by creating career-ladder jobs through rooftop solar installations.

This report assesses the FiT program’s early impacts on the local solar market and on local employment. Researchers find that 40 percent of proposed solar projects are in solar equity “hot spots,” meaning in neighborhoods with high solar rooftop potential and indicators of high socioeconomic and environmental distress.

This is the third report in a three-part series commissioned by the Los Angeles Business Council and involving LCI research. The first, Making a Market: Multifamily Rooftop Solar and Social Equity, looks at areas of opportunity within the multifamily market. A follow-up report, Empowering LA’s Solar Workforce: New Policies that Deliver Investments and Jobs, focuses on the commercial and industrial markets as well as the solar workforce.

See LCI’s Energy Program page for other examples of how LCI scholars are expanding knowledge and capacity to advance equitable energy policies and programs.