How individuals perceive the safety of their public drinking water influences whether they reach for the tap to quench their thirst, or an alternative, such as bottled water or a sugary drink. In turn, mistrust of drinking water quality and subsequent reliance on alternative beverage sources can adversely impact health, welfare, and the environment.

We are conducting research and hosting discussions to increase trust in tap water. As part of LCI’s newest water initiative, we are starting this work in Los Angeles County, with the potential to expand to other parts of California.

CURRENT PROJECT(S)

The researchers aim to address the persistent issue of unsafe and unreliable drinking water across the U.S. by focusing on the widespread fragmentation of community water systems. They will build a scalable, data-driven model that estimates feasible compliance solutions – either treatment upgrades or system consolidation – and associated capital costs for systems violating drinking water standards.

Learn more

Researcher(s): Khalid Osman, Greg Pierce, Grace Harrison, and collaborators
Funder: Stanford University

In partnership with Physicians for Social Responsibility Los Angeles, Rachel Connolly and her colleagues aim to address community concerns about air and water quality following the January 2025 fires. The researchers will center community perspectives to collect information about how residents perceived personal environmental risks before, during, and after the fires, including their trust in public information sources. Ultimately, the project seeks to advance environmental justice by supporting community-led efforts to build resilience during climate-driven crises.

Researcher(s): Rachel Connolly, Gregory Pierce, Megan Mullin, and Silvia R. González
Funder: UCLA Center for Community Engagement (Social Impact Collaboratives) and The Water Foundation

Led by Rural Community Assistance Partnership Incorporated, the Luskin Center for Innovation, and partners are conducting six assessments for drinking water quality/compliance in five states and one US territory over the next four years. This report will enable state officials and water system managers to identify solutions and access federal funding for much-needed water quality improvements.

Researcher(s): Grace Harrison, Gregory Pierce, Lena Schlichting, Laura Landes, Steve Wilson, Hideyuki Terashima, and others
Funder: National Environmental Finance Center

Led by the Pacific Institute, the Luskin Center for Innovation, the University of North Carolina Environmental Finance Center, and Corvias Infrastructure Solutions are researching emerging approaches employed by utilities implementing affordable water programs for low-income customers.

Learn More

Researcher(s): Gregory Pierce and Grace Harrison
Funder: Water Research Foundation

PUBLISHED RESEARCH

Southern California Community Water Systems Atlas (2025 report, map, and dataset)

Researcher(s): Edith B. de Guzman, Gregory Pierce, Jennifer Gorman, Lauren Dunlap, Michael Rincon, Itzel Vasquez-Rodriguez, and Vivian Cruz

Southern California has a complex network of 663 drinking water systems across six counties: Los Angeles, Kern, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. Together, these utilities serve 40 percent of California’s population. Developed in coordination with UC Agriculture and Natural Resources, the Luskin Center for Innovation’s report and companion mapping tool provide the most comprehensive public resource on water systems, shedding light on disparities in water quality, affordability, governance, and climate resilience.

Engaging the Public on Water Issues Through Art, What’s on Tap: L.A.’s Water Story…Source to Spigot (2025 report)

Researchers: Edith B. de Guzman and Leonard Holler

Funders: Accelerate Resilience L.A. (a sponsored project of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, Inc.) and the California Institute for Water Resources

This report summarizes the 2024 traveling exhibit, “What’s on Tap,” which explored water equity, quality, and access in Los Angeles through art, science, and community dialogue. Co-curated by Edith and Jolly de Guzman, the exhibit offered an innovative model for environmental communication that made complex water challenges tangible and locally resonant.

Assessing Drinking Water Systems to Improve Performance and Capacity (2024 article in Journal AWWA)

Researchers: Emily V. Bell, Katy Hansen, and Megan Mullin

Funder: U.S. Geological Survey

The authors find that 1) fragmented data across state agencies reduce the ability to assess a community water system’s overall condition, 2) identifying relationships among different dimensions of performance can help assess system resilience, 3) balancing affordability with reliability over time is an ongoing challenge, and 4) focusing only on safe drinking water compliance in research and oversight may overlook other critical vulnerabilities.

Assessing Performance and Capacity of US Drinking Water Systems (2024 article in Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management)

Researchers: Emily V. Bell, Katy Hansen, and Megan Mullin

Funder: U.S. Geological Survey

This study focused on understanding correlations among different dimensions of drinking water system performance and resilience. The researchers present a network-based method to describe the relationships between dimensions within and across systems. They find that in North Carolina community water systems face tradeoffs in water affordability and long-term reliable service.

Tap Water Quality and Distrust in Los Angeles County: Strategies to Address Premise Plumbing (2024 report)

Researchers: Itzel Vasquez-Rodriguez and Gregory Pierce

Distrust of tap water is partly driven by undetected issues with “premise plumbing;” the pipes that move water from a distribution network to the tap in a home, school, or business. In partnership with the Los Angeles County Chief Sustainability Office, LCI researchers developed 22 specific recommendations, presented within five policy briefs, to guide 1) Los Angeles County; 2) the State of California; 3) landlords; 4) community water systems; and 5) advocacy organizations on how to reduce premise plumbing issues and help improve trust in tap water.

Considerations for a National Drinking Water Quality Compliance Assessment (2023 report)

Researchers: Gregory Pierce, Laura Landes, Grace Harrison, Lena Schlichting and Lauren Dunlap

Researchers provide a comprehensive roadmap for what the first national assessment of drinking water quality compliance can and should look like in the next decade.

The Geography and Socioeconomic Characteristics of U.S. Households Reliant on Private Wells and Septic Systems (2023 Article in Journal of the American Water Resources Association) (2023 article in Journal of the American Water Resources Association)

Researchers: Arianna Hernandez, Gregory Pierce

This study uses the 2019 American Housing Survey to produce the first joint, nationally representative analysis of household reliance on wells and septics in decades. Researchers find that there are lower proportions of U.S. households in the regulated water grid than other contemporary estimates.

The Effects of Drinking Water Service Fragmentation on Drought-related Water Security (2020 article in Science)

Researcher: Megan Mullin

This discussion of the local political economy of drinking water provision reveals the constraints on community water systems that affect their performance when confronting drought hazards. Fragmentation in responsibility for drinking water contributes to disparities in drought vulnerability, preparation, and response across households and communities.

Drinking Water Needs Assessment: Informing the 2021-22 Safe & Affordable Drinking Water Fund Expenditure Plan (2021 report)

Researchers: Gregory Pierce, Kelly Trumbull, Peter Roquemore, and many others

This assessment provides foundational information and recommendations to guide the state to achieve the Human Right to Water. The results illustrate the breadth and depth of challenges to safe and affordable water supply provision across system types in California.

Assessing California’s Vulnerable Drinking Water Systems for Risks and Solutions (2021 report)

Researchers: Gregory Pierce, Peter Roquemore, Kelly Trumbull, and Julien Gattaciecca

This study published by the California State Water Board and supported by UCLA research identifies a risk for failure among a significant portion of the state’s small and medium-sized public water systems. The report is the first comprehensive analysis of how clean water is provided in California, and it estimates how much it would cost to deliver safe water to every resident.

Of the 2,779 public water systems evaluated in the study, nearly half are at some risk of failing to provide an adequate supply of safe drinking water. To measure the health of water systems, the researchers assessed each water system using 19 indicators for water quality, accessibility, affordability, and operational capacity. Learn more.

Lead Testing Program Development & Policy Recommendations for Early Care & Education Sites (2020 study)

Researchers: Gregory Pierce and Silvia R. González

With sponsorship from First 5 LA, LCI conducted several research and program development activities to support the implementation of Assembly Bill (AB) 2370. AB 2370, approved by California lawmakers in 2018, establishes requirements for testing lead exposure in drinking water in child daycare facilities. Our work included:

  • helping to analyze the likely extent of lead issues in daycare facilities under different testing threshold level scenarios;
  • hosting convenings of policy, advocacy, and community stakeholders in Los Angeles County, featuring lessons learned from the lead testing in schools program, and
  • analyzing existing water use practices and perceptions among daycare facilities to inform program design.

Evaluating the Performance of Water Systems in L.A. County (2020 report)

Researchers: Gregory Pierce and Kyra Gmoser-Daskalakis

A study by LCI found significant disparities in the quality, affordability, and accessibility of water across Los Angeles County. However, the number of health-related water-quality violations in the county is quite low compared to other parts of Southern California, the researchers concluded.